Publication of public observation

 Publication of public observation, the reviewer can see this particular standard is consistent. Until today still work. Look at another example. 1990,UGG boots clearance, the Hunan Provincial Committee of the party in the public crotch History Research edited and published Chen Fahua said: only a dozen meters from the bunker where, when, fifty-six 'Mountain Dog' drive along the valley low altitude over the face of fire. Suddenly, his left leg hanging flowers, because his injuries he was in a coma. but a short while he pick up the explosives. ... ... smoke, I see him while shouting 'Long live the people of China!''cats live West Long live!''live in West Long live Kim Il Sung,' ... ..., the side toward the bunker, with his chest to block the machine gun eyes. >
Jiguang story into primary school textbooks in China. Everyone knows the story does not have any aircraft But the article was published at the. Why? Look at the position is that regardless of true and false auditing standards at work. In the mouthpiece of the editorial staff of public opinion, the comrades of the position is correct, what difference does a few crap?

we can determine that the first edition of It is a deliberately false and not an accident. Each audit of the system staff have sufficient knowledge to see the story is false. But everyone also has a stronger commitment to publish the story to complete the crotch of publicity tasks. Is the

the second edition of That certainty from the Xinhua News Agency's However,UGG boots cheap, facts are not. This Congenital Xinhua News Agency reporters Gong Fu and Zai Haoye difficult to back days. Although relying on the version of the protection of the Chinese authorities to the year 2000, after barely, ultimately did not escape the fate suffered another negative. Readers if it is with the current official version of the A true story this is not possible to be denied repeatedly rewritten. Xinhua News Agency also prove that rewriting is not re-issued to correct the false news stories, but to a more serious fraud in more detail.

seven, Qin Jiwei Huang Jiguang denied.

Jiguang support the military-fifth of the former military forty-five division 135 regiment of soldiers. However, the Army commander Qin Jiwei was in his memoir in spare no pains to rule out the possibility of Jiguang deeds. 2000 According to the statement in the text of Qin, Huang Jiguang killed in the battle which in fact had a few hours before Jiguang intervention victory over. He said in the text Volunteers October 19th, 1952 at dusk when the battle was launched to recover position, said troops The Chinese public is well-known Jiguang story early in the morning in a few hours after the occurrence. Qin Jiwei's Blocking loophole makes it impossible feat event.

Jiguang fallen on time, the earliest reference is to the top of the Xinhua News Agency, Teams still under enemy fire suppression does not come up red. For decades this view has not changed basically. Chinese language textbook in the fourth grade of 1990, Deng Liqun, who edited December 2000 Xinhua News Agency reporters Li Shiyuan and Cai Fang Huang Jiguang long before his death Hail to the host again and again, Wan said the time is

Can not simultaneously be true. Jiguang sacrifice is Therefore, the sacrifice of his time must come before the victory can not be in its wake. Qin Jiwei to fight early,cheap UGG boots, Since the positions in the Site will be invincible can kill, no fort can be blocking situation. Even if there are bunkers, also has become a He and his comrades in addition to sweep the battlefield with an inventory of such prisoners beyond the reinforcement positions, I am afraid there is nothing else better to do.

Jiguang story of Qin Jiwei fifth Army and I am very favorable. He should be the same as the care of your eyes Jiguang love story. Fifth place now to personally deny the fifth Army Corps, a great hero of strange things. This is totally sensible. Qin Jiwei be inadvertently created a clerical error? But when I checked the information, only to discover that actually is not a typo. Jiguang not only by his combat time before his death in which the military commander in the negative, which is also forty-five teachers at the cadres of political books written denial. This problem is a great article. Li political cadres at the division tomorrow, Wang Jingzhong, Li Tianen three coauthored later, followed by the 103 mountains, wild, the support howitzer, assault with 7 (including two companies of troops tunnel), respectively, occupied by the enemy 537.7 597.9 Highland Heights and the implementation of counter positions Kitayama surface. ... ... war to 20 to 1, and annihilating with 5 to restore all the positions.

forces Obviously both are ruled out Jiguang dawn on the 20th dedicated to recapture the position and the possibility of war. Jiguang a volunteer division of the fifth Army forty-five hero. He is now commander denied, the division of political office also denied him. An even division of the army have to admit its fault of the

THERE. Negative Jiguang People's Liberation Army was also more authoritative literature. 2000 by the Military Science Publishing House's The book according to the Central Military Commission resolution, the former Deputy Chief of Staff Xu Huizi prepared for the leadership of head of the organization and included in the PLA, Its authority unquestionable. The book on page 292 of Volume III, said: 597.9 Heights to fight back U.S. forces. in sticking with the troops under the tunnel, to 20 1, wipe the surface occupy the high ground positions 597.9 U.S. 7th Division with a total of 5, all returned to the surface position, .

said this information is in black and white, Jiguang appearances ranging from the troops had At this point,UGGs, do not say As early as 1952, when it was just born a month Xinhua reinvent the wheel once. Now is the Army, the division and the Central Military Commission denied the literature prepared by the Organization. This kind of thing you want to insist that there is credibility, whether a deliberate insult to their intelligence?